| Bowel Cancer Screening Program |
| Bowel Cancer Screening Pilot |
| Idee | Pilotprojekt | Strategiepapier | Gesetzgebung | Umsetzung | Evaluation | Veränderung/Richtungswechsel | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Implemented in this survey? |
In 2005/06 the Australian government committed AU$43 million to a national screening program for bowel cancer. The target population is individuals turning 55 or 65 years of age plus those previously involved in the pilot program. While funds have been allocated for recruitment and the initial screening test, including the formation of a register, no specific additional funds have been allocated for the follow-up health care required by those who are identified as having a positive screen.
The results of the pilot program were predicated on a number of important issues:
1) that the target population would be individuals aged 55-75;
2) that attention should be given to providing Aboriginal people with greater access and information; and
3) that there would be sufficient capacity to provide the additional health services needed by those whose screening test was positive.
However, the policy as implemented is somewhat different: 1) the target population is individuals turning 55 or 65; 2) the target population for Aboriginal people is individuals aged 45 - 75; and 3) no additional funds were provided for the management of positive screening tests etc. Meanwhile a new government has been elected and it is unclear whether the existing program will be modified, continued unchanged or a different program implemented.
| Innovationsgrad | traditionell |
|
innovativ |
| Kontroversität | unumstritten |
|
kontrovers |
| Strukturelle Wirkung | marginal |
|
fundamental |
| Medienpräsenz | sehr gering |
|
sehr hoch |
| Übertragbarkeit | sehr systemabhängig |
|
systemneutral |
current previous
|
|||
No change from previous report.
| Idee | Pilotprojekt | Strategiepapier | Gesetzgebung | Umsetzung | Evaluation | Veränderung/Richtungswechsel | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Implemented in this survey? |
The new national government is focusing on two broad issues in relation to health: the re-negotiation of the Commonwealth-State healthcare agreements and the forthcoming budget. Therefore, most government announcements address issues such as reducing inefficiencies caused by the two levels of government and the problems of inflation and interest rates, rather than on specific issues such as funding for a particular program.
During the election campaign, the Labor party committed to finding a bowel screening program for those aged 50 and over. No further policy directions have been announced. However, in the light of both the negotiations around the agreement and the budget deliberations, those involved in implementing and evaluating the program are beginning to lobby the Minister about ongoing funding for the screening program as well as for the increase in colonoscopies expected as a result of screening. In particular, the scientists are concerned that if decisions are delayed until an agreement between the Commonwealth and States is reached or until the budget, it will be too late for many aspects of the program to be rolled out.
| Regierung | |||
| Government | sehr unterstützend | stark dagegen | |
| Wissenschaft | |||
| scientific community | sehr unterstützend | stark dagegen | |
current previous | |||
n/a
n/a
| Regierung | |||
| Government | sehr groß | kein | |
| Wissenschaft | |||
| scientific community | sehr groß | kein | |
current previous | |||
Those most directly affected are the individuals requiring follow-up colonoscopies. It has been estimated that the 200,000 people who have taken the screening test have created extra demand for 14,000 follow-up colonoscopies to check for cancer or pre-cancerous polyps. The extent to which these individuals have to wait depends on the capacity of the health system in the State in which they live ie whether there is a waiting list for colonoscopies.
The recommendations of the evaluation of the pilot program were modified for the implementation of the screening program (as detailed above). The previous report for this survey identified the down strema issues of ensuring the availability of high-quality colonoscopy services as an important issue. No evaluation of the current program is yet available.
Modification of the target population may have lowered participation rates compared with the pilot program. Any further changes (eg by changing the age to 50+) would potentially confuse participants. If the issues around the availability of follow-up are not resolved, both health outcomes and trust in the program may be undermined.
| Qualität | kaum Einfluss |
|
starker Einfluss |
| Gerechtigkeit | System weniger gerecht |
|
System gerechter |
| Kosteneffizienz | sehr gering |
|
sehr hoch |
current previous
|
|||
The main impact of lack of colonoscopy services is likely to be on equity. However, there may be a real or perceived impact on health outcomes if individuals cannot access follow-up services relatively quickly when their health is a concern.
Australian Government: Cancerscreening. www.cancerscreening.gov.au
"Colonoscopy queue swamps state hospitals". The Australian. March 1, 2008
Kees van Gool. "Bowel Cancer Screening Program". Health Policy Monitor, April 2006. Available at www.hpm.org/survey/au/a7/2
| Bowel Cancer Screening Program Process Stages: Umsetzung, Strategiepapier, Gesetzgebung |
| Bowel Cancer Screening Pilot Process Stages: Evaluation, Idee, Pilotprojekt |
Marion Haas