| Access to dental care in Australia |
| Access to dental care in Australia: a bit more |
| Idee | Pilotprojekt | Strategiepapier | Gesetzgebung | Umsetzung | Evaluation | Veränderung/Richtungswechsel | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Implemented in this survey? |
As part of an overhaul of the current healthcare system, a proposal has been released to introduce a AUS$4 billion universal dental scheme. The proposed scheme to be called ?Denticare? would be funded through a taxpayer levy and would provide access to preventative and restorative care and dentures.
In Australia dental services are provided in both public and private sectors. Public dental services, which are the responsibility of the States, have traditionally been directed towards children and low income adults and their capacity is limited. (Brennan 2008) Around 650,000 adults are on public dental waiting lists, with a two year average waiting time. (National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission 2009)
The Commission report recommends the creation of a Denticare scheme funded by an increase in the Medicare levy of 0.75% of taxable income. Under the Denticare proposal Australians will have to opt to "become a member of a dental health plan (with a private health insurer) or to use public dental services". In other words Denticare would pay the insurance premiums fees, but patients will get reimbursed 85% of the fees, incurring in a 15% out-of-pocket cost. Those who want to avoid the 15% gap payment could elect to be covered under the public dental system, where treatment could be totally free but with a waiting time.
The proposed reform also recommends (National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission 2009):
To establish a universal dental scheme that provides access to preventative and restorative dental care and dentures, regardless of a person's ability to pay.
Financial
Goverment, Dentists, Taxpayers
| Innovationsgrad | traditionell |
|
innovativ |
| Kontroversität | unumstritten |
|
kontrovers |
| Strukturelle Wirkung | marginal |
|
fundamental |
| Medienpräsenz | sehr gering |
|
sehr hoch |
| Übertragbarkeit | sehr systemabhängig |
|
systemneutral |
The ratings above indicate that this proposal is rather traditional. Other countries such as the United Kingdom have already implemented Universal dental schemes. However, increased taxes that go into a general revenue pool and that would give everyone the option of taking private dental insurance (people already have this choice without the proposed extra levy increase) make the proposal highly controversial. The transferability from Australia to other systems seems unlikely.
In early 2008 the National Labor Government appointed the National Health and Hospital Reform Commission (NHHRC) (also see the report Reforming the Australian Health System (13)2009). The commission is looking at the long-term health needs of the nation and has identified dental services as a priority area. Denticare is only one of 116 proposed medical reforms contained in the interim report. It is expected that the final plan will be delivered to Canberra mid- 2009.
Shortly before the 2007 federal election the previous Liberal Government initiated a Medical Dental Scheme, for chronically ill patients (see Health Monitor report Access to dental care in Australia: a bit more (10) 2007). The current government has unsuccessfully attempted to stop this scheme in federal parliament. The current government considers that before a national dental care system is introduced the current medical dental scheme has to disappear. But political parties such as the Greens do no support the initiative because "it would leave Australia with only the promise of a full national dental plan at some time in the future and with no publicly funded dental care at all in the meantime". (Cresswell and Ryan 2009)
| Idee | Pilotprojekt | Strategiepapier | Gesetzgebung | Umsetzung | Evaluation | Veränderung/Richtungswechsel | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Implemented in this survey? |
Since the establishment of Medicare in the early 1980, this is the first time there is an open discussion about a national dental healthcare system. As previously described Denticare is one of the recommendations of the National Health and Hospital Reform Commission (NHHRC).
The proposed Denticare reform differs from the existing Medicare funding arrangements. Medicare covers medical services by acting as an insurer, and medical services covered by Medicare cannot be covered by private insurance. There is no opting out as everyone is covered by Medicare. Under Denticare everyone will be eligible for the public insurance scheme. But individuals can choose to retain their private insurance cover, in which case Denticare will provide a risk adjusted payment to the insurer with individuals able to increase their cover. This is a managed competition model, and quite different to the existing relationship between insurers and the government funding.
The approach of the idea is described as:
renewed:
The Australian Dental Association (ADA-peak group for private dentists) described "Denticare" as too complex, inefficient and impractical. Dr. Neil Hewson (president of the ADA) commented that that the Government should focus on the delivery of health care to those who needed it the most, 35% of the community who cannot afford proper dental care. Dr. Hewson also warned that Denticare could nearly double the cost of dentistry. (Australian Dental Association 2009) However the ADA supports the proposed one year internship scheme for dentists prior to full registration. Interns will be required to practice in the public sector or in rural and remote areas. It also supported the initiative of improved health promotion.
The Association for the promotion of oral health described the initiative as a two tier system "where federal funding would be simply given to the private system".
Professor John Spencer who has studied the dental industry for more than two decades is in favour of Denticare. He considers that the Denticare proposal could lead to national standards of care being established with an emphasis on preventative rather than emergency treatments. (ABC 2009)
The chief executive of NIB (a private health insurance) described "Denticare" as "inefficient and lacking competition" The nationalisation of dental services was described a "disaster"
| Regierung | |||
| Commonwealth | sehr unterstützend | stark dagegen | |
| Leistungserbringer | |||
| Australian Dental Association | sehr unterstützend | stark dagegen | |
| Privatwirtschaft, privater Sektor | |||
| Private health insurers | sehr unterstützend | stark dagegen | |
| Meinungsführer | |||
| Academics | sehr unterstützend | stark dagegen | |
| Regierung | |||
| Commonwealth | sehr groß | kein | |
| Leistungserbringer | |||
| Australian Dental Association | sehr groß | kein | |
| Privatwirtschaft, privater Sektor | |||
| Private health insurers | sehr groß | kein | |
| Meinungsführer | |||
| Academics | sehr groß | kein | |
Public consultation is now closed for the interim report. It is expected that the final plan will be delivered to Canberra mid- 2009. It is important to note that the Commission has an advisory role. Therefore the Government is not compelled to implement the recommendations provided by the NHHRC. However it is expected that the Government will respond to this once the final report is released.
In its interim report the commission asserts that introducing "Denticare" will improve oral health and equitable access to dental care. The final report is expected to be release in mid June 2009. The Government would need to respond to the final recommendations. However Health Minister Nicola Roxon commented "They (the commission) have put forward a fairly radical proposal, obviously the way of delivering the services, and a tax, an extra levy attached to it, it is a fairly ambitious proposal." (Australian Associated Press 2009)
| Qualität | kaum Einfluss |
|
starker Einfluss |
| Gerechtigkeit | System weniger gerecht |
|
System gerechter |
| Kosteneffizienz | sehr gering |
|
sehr hoch |
The proposed measures are unlikely to deliver quality dental care. It is also unlikely that the proposed changes will result in a more equitable/efficient system.
| Access to dental care in Australia Process Stages: Evaluation |
| Access to dental care in Australia: a bit more Process Stages: Gesetzgebung |
Gallego, Gisselle