Health Policy Monitor
Skip Navigation

Means testing for hospitalisation subsidy (2)

Country: 
Singapur
Partner Institute: 
Department of Community, Occupational & Family Medicine, National University of Singapore
Survey no: 
(5)2005
Author(s): 
Lim Meng Kin
Health Policy Issues: 
Finanzierung, Zugang
Reform formerly reported in: 
Means testing for hospitalisation subsidy
Current Process Stages
Idee Pilotprojekt Strategiepapier Gesetzgebung Umsetzung Evaluation Veränderung/Richtungswechsel
Implemented in this survey? ja nein nein nein nein nein nein

Abstract

The Ministry of Health is thinking of using means-testing to determine qualification for subsidised hospital care.

Purpose of health policy or idea

It has been one year after the topic was raised, generating much discussion. Although lower-income patients generally welcome the idea, middle-income patients are unhappy or wary. Some are concerned that if means-testing were to be based on income, issues of privacy may arise should hospitals be allowed to access income databases to determine eligibility. Furthermore, the challenge of finding an administratively simple way to implement means-testing has proved daunting.

Realizing that the topic is a controversial one, the Health Minister Khaw Boon Wan has promised to do it gradually as it is not a pressing issue and in any case, few people are actually abusing the present subsidised ward system.

 Suchhilfe

Characteristics of this policy

Innovationsgrad traditionell recht innovativ innovativ
Kontroversität unumstritten kontrovers kontrovers
Strukturelle Wirkung marginal recht fundamental fundamental
Medienpräsenz sehr gering sehr hoch sehr hoch
Übertragbarkeit sehr systemabhängig neutral systemneutral

Political and economic background

Purpose and process analysis

Current Process Stages

Idee Pilotprojekt Strategiepapier Gesetzgebung Umsetzung Evaluation Veränderung/Richtungswechsel
Implemented in this survey? ja nein nein nein nein nein nein

Expected outcome

One idea that the MOH is considering, is instead of shutting well-off patients out of all subsidised wards, a sliding scale of subsidies may be introduced, so that those with higher-incomes can still go to subsidised wards, but get a lower subsidy. For example, most Class C patients may get the usual 80 per cent subsidy, but a better-off patient choosing a Class C ward will get a lower subsidy. Such an incremental approach might cushion the impact of means-testing on well-off patients.

But for now, there is no rush to implement it. The issue is on the back burner.

References

Reform formerly reported in

Means testing for hospitalisation subsidy
Process Stages: Idee

Author/s and/or contributors to this survey

Lim Meng Kin

Empfohlene Zitierweise für diesen Online-Artikel:

Lim Meng Kin. "Means testing for hospitalisation subsidy (2)". Health Policy Monitor, May 2005. Available at http://www.hpm.org/survey/sg/a5/1