| Idee | Pilotprojekt | Strategiepapier | Gesetzgebung | Umsetzung | Evaluation | Veränderung/Richtungswechsel | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Implemented in this survey? |
Denmark has a poor record on cancer survival rates compared to other countries at a similar income level. In an attempt to address the problem the Government has announced an ad hoc plan seeking to bring the performance level at par with the best performers internationally. A previous ad hoc initiative was initiated in February 2000 (the National Cancer Action Plan).
The main objective is to bring the results of cancer treatment in Denmark on level with the best international performers.
Instruments include a mix of extra funding and fine tuning. The actions suggested by the central government will influence (or seeks to influence):
It is the governments understanding that the introduction of new local governments ("Regions" to replace the existing counties) will somehow be better equipped to achieve the goals of the plan.
The main objective is to bring the results of cancer treatment in Denmark on level with the best international performers.
Basically the Cancer Plan operates within the existing incentives and is thought to work by way of extra funding.
| Innovationsgrad | traditionell |
|
innovativ |
| Kontroversität | unumstritten |
|
kontrovers |
| Strukturelle Wirkung | marginal |
|
fundamental |
| Medienpräsenz | sehr gering |
|
sehr hoch |
| Übertragbarkeit | sehr systemabhängig |
|
systemneutral |
Extra funding and statements on goals is a rather traditional form of policy.
The Danish record on cancer tretament appears to be poorer than what is experienced in countries at a similar level of income. This is perceived to be a problem. A previous ad hoc intiative - the National Cancer Action Plan 2000 - has not produced the result hoped for and the present plan seeks to correct this.
| Idee | Pilotprojekt | Strategiepapier | Gesetzgebung | Umsetzung | Evaluation | Veränderung/Richtungswechsel | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Implemented in this survey? |
The policy intiative (a political agreement between the government a majority within parliament) is based on a report from the Danish National Board of Health (link provided below).
The iniative follows a previous ad hoc initative from year 2000.
The approach of the idea is described as:
renewed:
The vocal players (the government, Danish National Board of Health ,the Danish Cancer Society) supports the initiative. There is broad agreement that the dismal performance calls for some kind of action. Groups of doctors, however, have voiced concern that some of the initiatives will fail due to staff shortages.
| Regierung | |||
| Minister of Health | sehr unterstützend | stark dagegen | |
| Danish National Board of Health | sehr unterstützend | stark dagegen | |
| Patienten, Verbraucher | |||
| The Danish Cancer Society | sehr unterstützend | stark dagegen | |
| Politische Parteien | |||
| The Danish People's Party (DPP) | sehr unterstützend | stark dagegen | |
The agreement between the government and a majority within parliament is expected to become part of the following years budget.
pending
| Regierung | |||
| Minister of Health | sehr groß | kein | |
| Danish National Board of Health | sehr groß | kein | |
| Patienten, Verbraucher | |||
| The Danish Cancer Society | sehr groß | kein | |
| Politische Parteien | |||
| The Danish People's Party (DPP) | sehr groß | kein | |
Previous plans have involved tensions between the central government and the counties. An evaluation of the previous initiative suggested that the counties had not followed the intentions. For instance, one problem had been that scanners had been to dispersed (perhaps reflecting local ambititons rather than what was deemed to be optimal planning). It is conceiveable that similar problems will surface this time.
The political agreement (as announced) does not specify the evaluation procedure but does indicate that evaluations will take place.
The previous plan did not succeed in bringing the Danish performance on level with countries with a similar level of income. According to the evaluation of the previous initiative there were
problems of coordination between the central authorities and the counties. The government dismisses these kinds of problems and appears very optimistic that the new structure of the public
sector (in which "regions" will replace counties and funding responsibility will rest with the central government and with minicipalities, i.e. agents seperated from the regions) will provide
better incentives. It is, however, difficult to see why this should be the case as the new system will be very similar to the old.
One novel aspect is that municipalities will co-finance the regions, and the government expects this to strengthen the effort in preventive care by the municipalities (since
municipalities in this way may save, in the long run, on resources to more expensive curative care). But municipalities are political bodies, and it it not obvious which
incentive politicians operating in one election period have to take a long term perspective.
The report Kræftplan II [Cancer Plan II] from the Danish National Board of Health is available (in Danish only) at Kræftplan II from the Board's homepage.
The policy paper Aftale mellem regeringen og Dansk Folkeparti (in Danish only) from the Ministry of Health specifying the political agreement between the government and one political party
is available at Aftale mellem regeringen og Dansk Folkeparti from the Ministry's homepage.
Michael O. Appel