| Idea | Pilot | Policy Paper | Legislation | Implementation | Evaluation | Change | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Implemented in this survey? |
At a time when many countries are thinking of how to cut back on health expenditures, Singapore?s health planners are busy laying the groundwork for the expansion and upgrading of its health facilities over the next ten years, costing billions of dollars. More land would be opened up for the development of health facilities. This is in response to requests from the private health-care sector, which has indicated it needs more facilities to cope with the 20% annual growth in foreign patients. A
Growth in the number of foreign patients has been averaging 20% in the last few years, thanks to stepped-up efforts by Singapore Medicine, a government-industry partnership established in 2003 to turn Singapore into a leading medical hub. Foreign patient figures doubled from 200,000 in 2002 to 400,000 in 2005. Four out of five were treated at private clinics and hospitals.
The private sector presently accounts for 21% of hospital beds, the majority belonging to for-profit, investor-owned, listed companies. The Ministry of Health is actively working with the Ministry of National Development and the Urban Renewal Authority to identify possible sites for the building of private hospitals. Specifics are still under discussion but it is understood that foreigners would be allowed to bid and operate new private hospitals here.
Additionally, MOH has indicated it is open to having private hospitals within the campuses of the public sector "restructured" or corporatized hospitals. So farv four possible plots have been identified, 3 of which were near existing public hospitals (i.e. adjacent to the Tan Tock Seng Hospital, within the Singapore General Hospital and within the National University Hospital).
| Degree of Innovation | traditional |
|
innovative |
| Degree of Controversy | consensual |
|
highly controversial |
| Structural or Systemic Impact | marginal |
|
fundamental |
| Public Visibility | very low |
|
very high |
| Transferability | strongly system-dependent |
|
system-neutral |
Demand for quality health care services, from both domestic and international patients, is expected to rise sharply. There are two reasons for this.
A related, secondary policy that has been place for more than a decade now, is to expand the private sector. The Ministry of Health had as early as 1993 signaled that it would like to see the private sector share of hospital beds to grow from, 20% to 30%. But left to market forces and in the absence of attractive incentives in land-scarce Singapore (where property prices have been skyrocketing), that figure has remained more or less stagnant, and now stands at only 21%.
| Idea | Pilot | Policy Paper | Legislation | Implementation | Evaluation | Change | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Implemented in this survey? |
The private sector has welcomed the move. One private hospital has said it is thinking of converting a block of existing apartments into serviced apartments for patients' families. The idea of having private hospitals within the campuses of the public sector "restructured" or corporatized hospitals is not new, but had been resisted previously on grounds that it might not go down well with Singaporeans. It would appear that times have changed, and the government now thinks that Singaporeans are ready for such an idea. It even rationalizes that the push is not solely for the purpose for attracting foreign patients, but for the good of Singapore patients as well - explaining that doctors here may not have enough experience treating less common diseases if they were limited to just local patients.
So far, reactions from the public and the medical profession to these developments have been muted.
| Government | |||
| Ministry of Health | very supportive | strongly opposed | |
| Tourism Board | very supportive | strongly opposed | |
| Economic Development Board | very supportive | strongly opposed | |
| Trade Development Board | very supportive | strongly opposed | |
| Providers | |||
| Public Hospitals | very supportive | strongly opposed | |
| Private Hospitals | very supportive | strongly opposed | |
| Patients, Consumers | |||
| Public | very supportive | strongly opposed | |
| Private Sector or Industry | |||
| Hotels | very supportive | strongly opposed | |
| Travel Agencies | very supportive | strongly opposed | |
| Government | |||
| Ministry of Health | very strong | none | |
| Tourism Board | very strong | none | |
| Economic Development Board | very strong | none | |
| Trade Development Board | very strong | none | |
| Providers | |||
| Public Hospitals | very strong | none | |
| Private Hospitals | very strong | none | |
| Patients, Consumers | |||
| Public | very strong | none | |
| Private Sector or Industry | |||
| Hotels | very strong | none | |
| Travel Agencies | very strong | none | |
Asia's medical travel market is projected to be worth S$7 billion within the next five years, boosted in part by increasingly affluent consumers in India and China. Singapore is already widely regarded to be among the best healthcare service providers in Asia (half of all JCI accredited hospitals are presently found in Singapore), but faces stiff competition, mainly from Thailand and India.
Singapore's manageably small size and nimbleness may prove to be an advantage. Various government agencies are already working in concert, each playing a distinct role in Singapore Medicine. For example, the Economic Development Board attracts healthcare and biomedical investments and co-funds developments in high-tech healthcare capabilities; International Enterprise Singapore (known formerly as the Singapore Trade Development Board) supports regionalization of the local healthcare players and the Singapore Tourism Board looks after international marketing and promotes people-oriented services, in collaboration with the Ministry of Health. In August 2006, Singapore Medicine hired McKinsey & Company to draw up strategies to help Singapore Medicine attain its goals.
| Quality of Health Care Services | marginal |
|
fundamental |
| Level of Equity | system less equitable |
|
system more equitable |
| Cost Efficiency | very low |
|
very high |
Lim Meng Kin